🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.